<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Our Health Care Now! (and some more stuff)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/07/24/free-our-health-care-now-and-some-more-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/07/24/free-our-health-care-now-and-some-more-stuff/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:40:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dochudson</title>
		<link>http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/07/24/free-our-health-care-now-and-some-more-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Dochudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joncaldara.com/?p=1234#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard and seen in many places that Republicans / Conservatives have no alternatives for National Healthcare as written. As we can readily see from the illustration above, the truly healthcare needy exist, though in much smaller numbers. It is very obvious that the Libs have no real concern for them. The most glaring omission is that there is NO tax benefit for a Healthcare Professional donating services to those in real need of care. Many, if not most, providers would donate care for as little as a 30% tax credit of the worth of the services. Significant &#039;Bang for the Buck&#039; return! I sincerely believe that even long term care and catastrophic needs could be addressed through tax credits / subsidies. This will also preserve the Doctor/Patient relationship since those in need of care can choose from a list of providers who wish to be available. Possibly, even for-profit insures might be willing to subsidize the truly needy if they could obtain a significant tax consideration.
Libs NEVER seem to consider how to permit / encourage the private sector to address a significant problem through rewarding (tax credits) the desired outcome.
-Doc Hudson-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard and seen in many places that Republicans / Conservatives have no alternatives for National Healthcare as written. As we can readily see from the illustration above, the truly healthcare needy exist, though in much smaller numbers. It is very obvious that the Libs have no real concern for them. The most glaring omission is that there is NO tax benefit for a Healthcare Professional donating services to those in real need of care. Many, if not most, providers would donate care for as little as a 30% tax credit of the worth of the services. Significant &#8216;Bang for the Buck&#8217; return! I sincerely believe that even long term care and catastrophic needs could be addressed through tax credits / subsidies. This will also preserve the Doctor/Patient relationship since those in need of care can choose from a list of providers who wish to be available. Possibly, even for-profit insures might be willing to subsidize the truly needy if they could obtain a significant tax consideration.<br />
Libs NEVER seem to consider how to permit / encourage the private sector to address a significant problem through rewarding (tax credits) the desired outcome.<br />
-Doc Hudson-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

