<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Care&#8217;s Dubious Constitutionality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/08/17/obamacares-dubious-constitutionality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/08/17/obamacares-dubious-constitutionality/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:40:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Harry Reid just a misunderstood genius? : Peoples Press Collective</title>
		<link>http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/08/17/obamacares-dubious-constitutionality/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Harry Reid just a misunderstood genius? : Peoples Press Collective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joncaldara.com/?p=1301#comment-658</guid>
		<description>[...] Huh?&#160; What part of taking over 1/6th of the American economy, spending our children in to bankruptcy, and wrecking the health care system that&#8217;s the envy of the world does not impinge on multiple Constitutional rights, not least the fact that it&#8217;s patently unconstitutional to require someone to buy something (insurance) as a condition of citizenship? That and other constitutional questions surround ObamaCare, including a few discussed HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Huh?&#160; What part of taking over 1/6th of the American economy, spending our children in to bankruptcy, and wrecking the health care system that&#8217;s the envy of the world does not impinge on multiple Constitutional rights, not least the fact that it&#8217;s patently unconstitutional to require someone to buy something (insurance) as a condition of citizenship? That and other constitutional questions surround ObamaCare, including a few discussed HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I2I newsletter &#171; Conservative Libertarian Outpost</title>
		<link>http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/08/17/obamacares-dubious-constitutionality/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>I2I newsletter &#171; Conservative Libertarian Outpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joncaldara.com/?p=1301#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] law expert Rob Natelson (and the answer appears to be a big, fat yes). Guest blogging over at The Cauldron, Rob lays out what he calls &#8220;profound&#8221; constitutional difficulties with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law expert Rob Natelson (and the answer appears to be a big, fat yes). Guest blogging over at The Cauldron, Rob lays out what he calls &#8220;profound&#8221; constitutional difficulties with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: He&#8217;s Not MY Doctor ,,, lets put these stickers on all our cars!!! &#171; The Arizona Sentinel</title>
		<link>http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/08/17/obamacares-dubious-constitutionality/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>He&#8217;s Not MY Doctor ,,, lets put these stickers on all our cars!!! &#171; The Arizona Sentinel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joncaldara.com/?p=1301#comment-118</guid>
		<description>[...] law expert Rob Natelson (and the answer appears to be a big, fat yes). Guest blogging over at The Cauldron, Rob lays out what he calls &#8220;profound&#8221; constitutional difficulties with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law expert Rob Natelson (and the answer appears to be a big, fat yes). Guest blogging over at The Cauldron, Rob lays out what he calls &#8220;profound&#8221; constitutional difficulties with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Obamacare Constitutional? &#124; My Legal Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/08/17/obamacares-dubious-constitutionality/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Obamacare Constitutional? &#124; My Legal Spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joncaldara.com/?p=1301#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] of Montana constitutional law professor) Rob Natelson suggests not, in this blog post. (Which is cross-posted on the blog of Ind. Inst. President Jon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Montana constitutional law professor) Rob Natelson suggests not, in this blog post. (Which is cross-posted on the blog of Ind. Inst. President Jon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

