Tune in on this lovely Friday evening to your favorite public affairs TV show – Devils Advocate – on Colorado Public Television channel 12 at 8:30pm. Tonight my guests are Dusty Saunders and Sen. Shawn Mitchell. First up, Dusty takes me back in time when the news media consisted of news print and 3 TV channels. We cover Dusty’s career in newspapers and TV, and chat about his new book, “Heeeeeere’s Dusty.” Then Sen. Shawn Mitchell sits down with me in what may become his swan song Caldara interview. Sen. Mitchell is term-limited after this session so we had to bring him on one last time as “senator.” Shawn makes the case for his drug sentencing reform bill, while addressing conservative concerns over law and order, fiscal responsibility, and drug culture. That’s tonight at 8:30, replayed Monday at 1:30pm.

Last week, our Education Policy Center hosted its first ever brown bag lunch with presentation on the research that informs educator effectiveness policies. The presenter was Manhattan Institute senior fellow and University of Colorado at Colorado Springs professor Dr. Marcus Winters. He shared with our audience the findings from his new book, Teachers Matter. After his 30 minute presentation, Dr. Winters fielded questions from the audience for about 20 minutes. Below you’ll find both the presentation video and the Q and A video. Additionally, Marcus dropped by our podcast studio to do a podcast with our Ben DeGrow. You can listen to the iVoices.org podcast here.

Perusing the Denver Post opinion section this morning, a bizarre headline caught my attention, “Proud to Pay Taxes in Colorado.” What a strange statement, especially in light of the recent scandals involving taxpayer subsidized Solyndra (and soon Vestas) and the General Services Administration (GSA). Why would anyone be proud to pay for those debacles? Anyway, as I read the piece written by Ali Mickelson of the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, I realized a few things: First, for someone so proud to pay taxes, it’s strange that Ali works for the nonprofit Fiscal Policy Institute. I can only wonder if Ali is adding an extra zero or two onto her income taxes to make up for the taxes that her employer doesn’t pay. Secondly, her whole argument assumes that without tax funded and state provided goods and services, we would all be living hand to mouth on subsistence farms. I disagree. The goods and services that consumers want would exist whether government forced them on us or not. It’s the frivolous, inefficient, wasteful spending on things people don’t want that would disappear along with our heavy tax burdens. Finally, despite my disagreement with Ali’s claims, they are her opinion and she’s entitled to it. However, there is one claim in the article that I must take issue with. She says,

This year, when you are writing your check, remember that Colorado is a low-tax state. Colorado’s combined state and local taxes rank 44th lowest out of the 50 states per $1,000 of income.

Now that is not an opinion, that is a statement of fact. And it’s a fact that is completely wrong.

I hate to break the news to Ali and her tax and spend compatriots over at the Fiscal Policy Institute, but being what they are, they really should know the truth about Colorado’s fiscal and tax policy. We are not 44th in the nation in our tax burden, we are smack dab in the middle at 26th. What the left fails to mention every time they claim Colorado is a low tax state is that state taxes are only HALF the equation. It would be like saying, “My company is rich! We took in $1,000,000 in revenue this month!” But then fail to mention that they spent $2,000,000 to make it. When you only look at state taxes, it is true that Colorado falls towards the end of the spectrum. But when you take into account the rest of the equation – the LOCAL tax burden – Colorado moves back up towards the middle. Why? Because in Colorado, we do most of our taxation at the local level. Per capita, our local taxes are some of the highest in the country. A good way to look at it is, instead of levying a few very large taxes on everyone, Colorado levies many small taxes on everyone. Almost anything and everything that can be taxed is, just at a relatively small amount.

The bottom line is this: to get the real story on Colorado’s tax burden, check out our Issue Paper, “How Colorado’s Tax Burden Ranks Nationally.” And the next time someone says we rank near the bottom in taxation, remind them that there is another half of the equation that they conveniently left out. Then they’ll thank you when they learn we are a healthy 26th in taxation. Just high enough to avoid dirt roads, starvation, and the apocalypse.

Attorney Mario Nicolais joined me to talk about defeating Colorado’s campaign finance laws.

David Barber joined me to talk about his new book, “Gigging.” In it, he tells stories about the local Denver music scene as it unfolded over the last couple of decades.

I read in the Post this morning that Governor Hickenlooper seems to be telegraphing his disapproval and potential veto of SB 124. SB 124 is a GOP sponsored bill that would expand Colorado’s tourism projects and allow for tax-increment financing (TIF) to fund all 6 pet projects at once. Not exactly the most free market bill ever dreamed up. In fact, when catch phrases like TIF, the Economic Development Commission, and tax incentives are describing the same bill, you can bet it’s more about central planning than the market.  It’s a strange scenario where I publically implore Hick to do the free market thing and strike down this bill that will force taxpayers to subsidize pet projects no one else seems to be willing to pay for with their own money. No, central planning doesn’t work no matter which party is pushing it.

You’re invited next Thursday, April 12, to our new Denver Freedom Embassy home for a special Brown Bag Lunch event on an important Colorado K-12 education issue. Dr. Marcus Winters, author of the new book Teachers Matter, will share his expert insights into the research on “educator effectiveness.” While that phrase makes me think of how effectively various nuns rapped my knuckles for acting up in class, I think our guest speaker has something a little different in mind. RSVP for the April 12 event to RSVP@i2i.org. You can find more information on this Education Policy Center flyer. If you come and help make the event a success, who knows? It might become the first in a Brown Bag Lunch policy series.

Here’s Rep. Spencer Swalm on auditing RTD:

As if you hadn’t had enough Tim Tebow, here’s Wayne Laugesen on Tebow, Manning, and the Broncos season coming up:

Friday night means the Independence Institute’s public affairs TV show Devil’s Advocate on Colorado Public Television 12. First, state representative Spencer Swalm sits down with me to talk about his recent request for an audit of the Regional Transportation District (RTD). Then Wayne Laugesen, editorial page editor of the Colorado Springs Gazette swings by to discuss Peyton Manning, Tim Tebow and the Denver Broncos. That’s 8:30 p.m. tonight on Colorado Public Television 12. Re-broadcast Monday at 1:30 p.m.

Dave woke up at the crack of dawn this morning to make an appearance on CNN to discuss the ever so popular topic, Stand Your Ground laws, as they pertain to the George Zimmerman, Trayvon Martin case. See the video below:

Independence Institute research director Dave Kopel reminds everyone on his website that the Independence Institute was some of the first to attend the “Obamacare is unconstitutional” dance party. Thankfully, many more of have joined us since those early days, but it’s worth taking a look back at the scholarship we’ve amassed for the last two-plus years. Below you’ll find Dave’s overview of our work:

When did the Independence Institute explain that Obamacare was probably unconstitutional? Senior Fellow Rob Natelson on Jan. 23, 2010. Research Director Dave Kopel on March 22, 2010 (tax power), and April 2, 2010 (commerce power, constitutional structure). Here is the video of Kopel’s April 28, 2010, debate with former Colorado Supreme Court Justice Jean Dubofsky, who had announced, “I believe that the lawsuit stands little chance of success,” and “The mechanism chosen by Congress to enforce the requirement of health insurance is not unusual.”

Testimony on D.C. Council’s proposed revision to the District’s gun control laws. Kopel argues against a provision which excessively discriminates against people with visual impairments. The testimony also critiques D.C.’s unusual system of long gun registration. Feb. 13, 2012.

Kopel testified on Nov. 17 before the U.S. Senate subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism regarding S. 463, Senator Schumer’s bill to vastly expand the number of people prohibited from owning or temporarily possessing a firearm. 29-page written testimony. Video of subcommittee hearing. Kopel’s 5 minute prepared remarks begin at 72:41. At 103:40, there is a Q&A with Senator Grassley, with leads to follow-up questions with Senator Schumer, in which Kopel explains to Schumer what the Schumer bill actually does. Kopel discusses the bill on NRA News. Media coverage: NPR, ABC, Governing, Albany Times Union.

Kopel testified on Sept. 13 before the U.S. House subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, regarding H.R. 822, which would set up a national system of interstate reciprocity for concealed handgun carry permits. Kopel’s 24-page written testimony. Video of the subcommittee hearing. Cato Institute podcast with Kopel on the issue.